
You’ve got the vision.
The strategy.
The priorities.
Maybe even the beautiful 47-slide PowerPoint deck. 👀
Everyone leaves the meeting aligned, inspired, and ready to go.
Then someone asks the question that often determines whether the strategy actually becomes reality:
Okay… who’s doing what, and by when?
And suddenly things get a little quieter. Because here’s one of the biggest mistakes I’ve seen organizations make when developing a strategy:
They create the strategy but forget to create the operating plan.
The strategy explains where you’re going.
It may explain why it matters.
It may even outline the major priorities that will get you there.
But without a clear plan for how the work will actually happen, teams are often left to figure it out for themselves. And that’s where things start to unravel.
What Happens When a Strategy Doesn’t Include an Execution Plan?
Without clear operational guidance, there is no shared coordination around how the work gets done. Everyone may agree on the destination while having completely different ideas about how to get there.
One team starts a project. Another team starts something similar. A third team is waiting for direction. Someone assumes someone else owns a critical piece of the work.
Six months later, people are frustrated because they have been working incredibly hard… but progress doesn’t look like what leadership expected.
This isn’t always a strategy problem. Sometimes, the strategy is perfectly fine. The execution system around it is missing.
Best Case: People Step Up.
People are empowered to lead, coordinate, and move the work forward.
That can be great.
But it can also mean the organization becomes dependent on the people who are naturally comfortable navigating ambiguity and taking initiative.
Worst case: Everyone creates their own version of the strategy.
People interpret priorities differently. Teams spin up competing projects. Resources get duplicated. Dependencies are discovered too late.
And suddenly, an initiative designed to create focus has created even more work.
Or…
That 47-slide strategy deck sits quietly in someone’s OneDrive. 😵
Strategy Needs to Answer More than “What?”
A strategy should absolutely help people understand what matters.
But if you want people to act on it, they also need answers to questions like:
- Who owns this?
- What happens first?
- What decisions need to be made before work can begin?
- Who needs to be involved?
- What does success look like?
- When should we expect to see progress?
This doesn’t mean your strategy needs to become a massive project plan.
In fact, one of the biggest mistakes organizations make is going too far in the other direction and trying to plan every single activity before anyone starts.
The goal isn’t to eliminate ambiguity.
The goal is to eliminate unnecessary ambiguity.
People don’t need every answer. But they do need enough clarity to know where to start, how their work connects to others, and who is responsible for making decisions.
Three Things Your Strategy Needs to Avoid Becoming “Just a Deck”
1. Identify the Work Between the Priorities
This is where many strategies break down.
A strategy might say: Improve the customer experience.
Great. But that isn’t work. It’s a desired outcome.
The important question is: What actually has to change for that outcome to become possible?
Maybe systems need to be updated. Maybe processes need to be redesigned. Maybe employees need new skills. Maybe leaders need to make decisions they have been avoiding. Maybe three different teams need to coordinate in a way they never have before.
The gap between the strategic priority and the actual work is where execution often gets lost.
A Helpful Exercise:
For every major strategic priority, ask: “What has to be true for this to happen?”
Keep asking until you move beyond aspirations and start identifying real work.
That exercise often surfaces dependencies, decisions, and ownership questions that aren’t visible in the strategy itself.
2. Make Ownership Visible, Not Assumed
“Everyone owns it” is usually another way of saying no one really owns it. That doesn’t mean one person needs to do all the work. It means someone needs to be accountable for moving the work forward.
One of the most useful distinctions organizations can make is between:
- The person doing the work
- The person coordinating the work
- The person making decisions
- The people who need to be involved
Those are not always the same person.
And when those roles aren’t clear, teams often spend a surprising amount of time managing confusion instead of making progress.
Here’s the insight:
Ownership is not the same as participation.
You can have 20 people contributing to an initiative while still having one person accountable for ensuring it moves forward.
Make that visible.
Don’t make people guess.
3. Design for the Handoffs, Not Just the Work
Most execution problems don’t happen because people don’t know how to do their individual jobs. They happen in the spaces between teams.
Marketing is waiting on data. The data team is waiting for a decision. Leadership thinks the decision has already been made. The project team is waiting for approval.
And everyone believes the delay belongs to someone else.
This is why project plans that simply list tasks often aren’t enough.
The most important part of execution is frequently the handoff.
Ask these questions:
- Where does work move from one team to another?
- What information needs to move with it?
- What decision unlocks the next phase?
- Who knows when something is ready to move forward?
- What happens if a dependency is delayed?
If your strategy requires cross-functional collaboration, the handoffs may be more important than the individual tasks.
Your execution plan should make the connections visible, not just the activities.
4. Decide How You Will Know When the Strategy Is Becoming Reality
Another mistake? Organizations measure outcomes so late that they don’t know execution is off track until it is difficult to fix.
Revenue may be an outcome. Customer satisfaction may be an outcome. Employee retention may be an outcome.
But those measures may not tell you whether the strategy is actually being executed until months later.
Instead, identify a few leading indicators of movement.
For example:
- Are the critical decisions being made?
- Are the right teams engaged?
- Are dependencies being resolved?
- Are the first changes actually being implemented?
- Are people changing the behaviors the strategy requires?
This gives leaders something much more useful than a status update.
It gives them visibility into whether the organization is actually moving.
Don’t just measure whether you reached the destination. Measure whether you’re making the turns required to get there.
The Best Strategies Give People Something to Believe In — and Something to Do
A strategy should inspire people. It should help them understand what matters and why. But inspiration alone doesn’t create execution. People also need to understand: What do I do now?
It needs to clearly explain:
- What changes?
- Where do I contribute?
- Who do I work with?
- What happens first?
- What decisions need to be made?
- And how will we know we’re making progress?
Because the moment a strategy leaves the PowerPoint and enters the organization, it becomes something very different.
It becomes work.
So, the next time you’re building a strategy, don’t stop when you’ve created something people can believe in.
Make sure you’ve also created something people can actually do.
Because a strategy without an execution plan isn’t necessarily a strategy that failed.
It may simply be a strategy that never had the opportunity to succeed.

Leave a Reply